In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
Ms. Ashby originally financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. In 2023, her work saw a substantial advancement when the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of a leading national corporation—awarded her organization a grant exceeding $100,000 (£80,000). This financial support was included in a larger $1.5 million program designed to assist “community-based non-profits spearheaded by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she admitted. “It was one of those moments where you realize that someone truly sees and values your work.”
Only two years prior, initiatives like this received widespread support from leading corporations throughout the United States, as the nation grappled with systemic racism after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black individual who lost his life beneath the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Companies like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken similar steps, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This change signifies a significant cultural transition, spurred partially by concerns over legal challenges, regulatory oversight, and social media backlash—pressures intensified by the new U.S. president.
Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously sought to dismantle DEI initiatives, promoting a return to “merit-based opportunity” in the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI programs and initiate investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of participating in “unlawful DEI practices.”
Within the early months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs closed its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency placed nearly 200 civil rights employees on paid leave, and Trump dismissed the country’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary previously suggested he should be removed due to his association with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
DEI-style programs first gained momentum in the U.S. during the 1960s in response to the civil rights movement, which sought to expand and protect the rights of Black Americans.
Initially framed under terms such as “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives aimed to counteract the long-standing consequences of slavery and the systemic discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to embrace “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within corporations and government agencies, DEI efforts largely focused on hiring policies that framed diversity as an economic advantage. Advocates argue that such programs address disparities across various communities, though much of the emphasis has historically been on racial equity.
The push for DEI surged in 2020 amid the Black Lives Matter protests and increasing demands for social change. Walmart, for instance, pledged $100 million over five years to establish its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo appointed its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already had similar leadership roles in place. Following these changes, S&P 100 companies created over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them going to people of color, according to Bloomberg.
However, just as quickly as these initiatives expanded, a conservative backlash emerged.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
Recently, detractors have amplified their assertions that DEI initiatives—originally crafted to fight discrimination—are themselves prejudiced, especially against white Americans. Training programs that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial prejudice have faced significant criticism.
The basis of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic model proposing that racism is deeply ingrained in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in educational institutions evolved into wider attempts to target “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts such as End Wokeness and conservative personalities like Robby Starbuck have leveraged this sentiment, focusing on companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for influencing policy changes at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his online audience.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant milestone came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decreed that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This ruling raised questions about the legal basis of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the decision, Meta notified employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before announcing the end of its own DEI initiatives.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift retreat of DEI programs among prominent corporations raises questions about the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nonetheless, not every company is succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation remarked that although DEI programs seem to be waning, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still incorporate DEI commitments within their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently voted to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI is polarized. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has decreased, yet support for associated matters—like equitable pay—remains robust. Likewise, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey revealed that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI initiatives as advantageous.
