In an expansive warehouse in eastern Thailand, near a major highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun meticulously examines piles of discarded electronics—circuit boards, scrap metal, and aging computer accessories. Each week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry investigate unauthorized facilities handling electronic waste, collecting samples for laboratory testing and regulatory enforcement.
Choddaechachainun leads a dedicated team that is concentrated on addressing the country’s rising problem with electronic waste, commonly referred to as e-waste. Despite frequent inspections and actions against these illegal operations—numerous of which are hidden in distant locations to avoid detection—the scale of the problem continues to expand.
Thailand is experiencing the consequences of a shift in global e-waste flows. Historically, countries like China handled the bulk of electronic refuse from wealthier nations, especially the United States and those within the European Union. That changed in 2018, when China instituted a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternatives across Southeast Asia, including Thailand.
Thailand applied its own prohibition on the importation of e-waste in 2020. However, the outcomes have been anything but positive. As reported by Earth Thailand, a nonprofit dedicated to environmental advocacy, the volume of e-waste brought into the country has surged from about 3,000 tons each year prior to the Chinese restriction to nearly 60,000 tons currently.
El constante flujo se debe en parte a la alta rotación de dispositivos electrónicos entre los consumidores occidentales. Las actualizaciones frecuentes de teléfonos inteligentes, computadoras portátiles y otros productos electrónicos—además de la posesión generalizada de grandes electrodomésticos—generan una cantidad considerable de desechos. Aunque existen regulaciones internacionales que buscan evitar la exportación de residuos peligrosos a países en desarrollo, aún hay vacíos legales. Por ejemplo, a menudo los envíos se declaran erróneamente como electrónicos usados destinados a la reventa, solo para ser desmantelados y fundidos al llegar.
The recycling process itself poses significant environmental risks. Once on Thai soil, the e-waste is crushed and smelted to extract valuable raw materials like copper and gold. While profitable, this method of recovery emits dangerous substances such as mercury and lead, and contaminates the air, soil, and water.
Thai officials believe that the majority of collected metals are transported to China, causing environmental and social consequences.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan is vocal about the harm these operations cause. He emphasizes that the illegal recycling industry contributes nothing to the national economy and instead damages local ecosystems and communities. His ministry has launched a more aggressive campaign to shut down unauthorized operations and expel foreign-owned plants involved in illegal processing.
Thailand is regarded as a dumping ground, Promphan observes. “We are dealing with an international waste management practice that provides no benefit to our country and leads to considerable damage.”
The negative impact extends to everyday citizens like Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old farmer in eastern Thailand. He claims that polluted runoff from a nearby smelting facility has hurt his cassava yield, and the stench of burning waste disrupts his sleep. Local activists maintain the smelter is operating illegally and are pressing authorities to intervene.
On an international level, the consequences are alarming. According to the United Nations, more than 60 million tonnes of electronic waste are created worldwide annually—twice the amount documented 15 years prior. Projections indicate that this number could increase by more than 30% before the decade concludes.
Despite the concerning rise, merely around 20% of worldwide electronic waste is processed through responsible and eco-friendly methods. The remainder is discarded in landfills or handled under hazardous conditions, frequently in nations with inadequate regulatory control.
Several nations have enacted regulations regarding extended producer responsibility. These regulations hold producers accountable for the disposal of their goods once they reach the end of their life span. Companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being urged to establish methods for reclaiming and recycling their merchandise.
Thailand is considering a similar legal framework, aiming to strengthen local regulation and reduce illegal activities linked to electronic waste management. Promphan is optimistic about its future implementation.
“I’m hopeful that we will enact this legislation soon—potentially before this year ends or at the beginning of the next,” he states. “We need comprehensive actions to eliminate this illegal industry and protect our people and the environment.”
As Thailand advances with legislative changes and strengthens oversight, these efforts symbolize a minor part of a broader global challenge. Handling electronic waste requires international cooperation, well-defined supply chains, and collaboration between users and manufacturers. Without significant change, the environmental repercussions of our technology-driven era could outweigh its benefits.
